#emacs #unix Miscellaneous notes on reading @ramin_hal9001 https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-fulfills-the-unix-philosophy.html
https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-unix-01_emacs-is-an-app-platform.html
https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-unix-02_what-is-the-unix-philosophy.html
https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-unix-03_unix-is-lesser-fp.html
https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-unix-04_lisp-does-fp-better-than-bash.html
https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-unix-05_unix-and-lisp-history.html
https://tilde.town/~ramin_hal9001/articles/emacs-unix-06_rebutting-critiques.html
For starters, excellent early history showing that unix and lisp are not direct relatives.
One small note that occurs to me is that in Mashey and Kernighan '84, they point at unix's shell's success at stopping people more C. 1/?? (but two for my purposes here)
I think this discussion (which has been very interesting!) seems similar to the idea of "bloat", which is almost the anthesis of the UNIX philosophy (although "anti-bloat" is a bit of a slippery slope, as ultimately all software is bloat)
I like Emacs because rather than installing a ton of different programs (RSS, mail, editor, scripting language, GUI, terminal, etc), I can just install Emacs. So it may be "bloated", but it ironically has fewer depenencies