mastodon.sdf.org is part of the decentralized social network powered by Mastodon.
"I appreciate SDF but it's a general-purpose server and the name doesn't make it obvious that it's about art." - Eugen Rochko

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.7K
active users

Learn more

So a friend ran some linear model using "lm" in R and a particular binary categorical variable had a non-statistically-significant coefficient. Then he ran the anova table on that model output and it gave that same variable a statistical significance. Now, neither of us thinks statistical significance is particularly of interest, we're both Bayesian. But the lm model has a Bayes with flat prior interpretation, is there any useful Bayesian interpretation to the ANOVA table?

Daniel Lakeland

Ultimately this is exploratory to see if the data is worth building a principled Bayesian model for... so I told him to just run the same formula from the lm model through to get a quick and dirty bayes-interpretable output.

Jan 07, 2023, 04:04 · · · Web · 0 · 0

Having thought about it a while I'm going to guess the most likely outcome is that the posterior will show correlations or nonlinear dependencies between the coefficients, and this results in different p values for the ANOVA calculations vs the marginals from the coefficients in the lm output. Will circle back after he gets brms output and see if my intuition was right.