Again, these puritan open source defenders. “It’s not open source if $bibleQuote”. “Just call it source available”. And all the other arguments.
From what I gather, the licence is still in the spirit of open source, just not to the letter. It doesn’t want large businesses taking the code , making a competitor and nor contributing back.
These open source defenders do not care about developers and their lives. They just want the code be released in a manner that respects their bible, to the letter.
Fine with the licence this dude wrote or with defending the “one true” definition of open source?
Anti Commercial-AI license