This article: webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-va

and this article:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9

Are both based on a preprint paper, which has been updated since, and the update directly invalidates the claim in the news articles:
medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

What do you think the chances are of these outlets updating their reporting?

@khm Those articles look like they were written by GPT-3 or something.

@cancel They've got human names attached to 'em, anyway. I've sent emails to see if they were interested in updated study results: radio silence.

@khm Hey, they're over a month old. I mean, nobody can even remember back that far. They basically never happened, right?

Follow

@cancel lost, in the mists of time. Even if the text were to be recovered it's probably written in Sanskrit or something, who can tell

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon @ SDF

"I appreciate SDF but it's a general-purpose server and the name doesn't make it obvious that it's about art." - Eugen Rochko