Four days in, Scrooge has called it quits, unimpressed with the early problems coming down to little more than parsing the problem input.
The later days may be more interesting, but I've decided my morning coffee breaks would be better spent on SICP, or reading papers for work.
@wasamasa Sending a patch (for eyebrowse) for review via Mastodon because it's small enough and I want to know if it'd have any place upstream.
@@ -681 +681,2 @@ behaviour of `ranger`, a file manager."
- (eyebrowse-init)
+ (dolist (frame (frame-list))
+ (eyebrowse-init frame))
I'm using EXWM's "workspaces" exclusively for multi-head support, and eyebrowse for actual workspaces. `eyebrowse-mode' doesn't initialize all frames (heads).
Should I just keep this to my config?
I have been officially proclaimed to be the biggest threat to the Common Lisp community right now.
Well, I guess it's sort of an #AchievementUnlocked
Finally updating my Guix server setup for the interest of maintainability. Switching over to using "guix deploy" (instead of my ad-hoc setup of logging in and deploying manually)
Yes, considering I mentored @jakob on this a year and a half ago for GSoC you'd think I'd have done this sooner ;P
It worked though! It's delightful to use! Finally, a server fleet deployment system I like!
It is illegal to boost this post
p = 49429002897777261000839566786960900348661596779839481928152034285352681641807686782292757653824830822496391192085567895071852258385592280527115222429444042313542936301974046594875899181233742229945549738766655661560628018266563543784515148821370566306893780280151659623161213410927305309695027848755504091783
q = 53602170802863928289500972217307025477290164757146419371852251620670300136901587204821451746991406880988053571342615187459978423766579984968561470104139545987787266751875098417999761783952366342302556060906681062460952347680147798276356366502237505269309185857430061068092584194979239221868593482021566547439
n = 2952619226006031733278005132921693726100042011592660779869675820212138145939883834312253789060663461194528411412874982355146048292836507534000115353036163880492136645451564382009196182566124637478277389304691251397819894417106558057773147299342857185830516918343274468842497499522414750028740163342718036209925403503207235945059541974923084211147227388348091101183403929204074586611952779802158116643840147678791643283706927948872797793849591629882391903699724329001797545580009544763555067611040895630150211640906898700482769873702547829023169433411394249565049633221004211830736052381384491512655254513796679593737
d = 142033101700003260678755863863267700134374886049156296238778043258513471417667391237505300342672722921505586813412391537592394712287451780540489111338082979901966887630936873112829448279475520471433931949082770983040743133849146064289054900225131501940560027662491217132619227565578893295128589581903273904124801461070363532834633728769178636552784294153467969250254358604276515140477045217505629092433114246051368410587618590542410950189868285511930901887132942539241081579465767831350539339965000260768249119651905050152151634478714116343168832447694793716937575319879226685046081583200335708696821445923072794535
e = 65537
Okay! I've finally written descriptions for all the @spritelyproject subprojects on https://spritelyproject.org/
Check it out!
The only string I could find to change.
The substitution is courtesy of my close friend from school. Yes, we're immature.
I prefer AT&T syntax and probably lift more than you do.
Twenty years old. He/him is fine.