“The language of climate activists today is of parts-per-million of carbon, peer-reviewed scientific papers, and technological fixes. But something is lost in all this abstraction. What is lost is our experience of connection to the earth. And I suspect that this is intentional. It’s easier to turn a forest or a mountain into a commodity when we don’t really feel anything for it. This is how we get sacrilegious environmental policies like carbon offsetting.”

— John…

Ha bloody ha.
If climate activists were ready to be sacreligious, they'd support the form of energy production which ― according to all scientific evaluations ― has not only the smallest life-cycle equivalent CO₂ emissions, but also the smallest environmental & human impacts of all kinds.
Instead they continue to oppose it tooth & nail, remaining loyal to the inherited doctrine that it is fundamentally immoral.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon @ SDF

"I appreciate SDF but it's a general-purpose server and the name doesn't make it obvious that it's about art." - Eugen Rochko