I "violently" agree that
RMS makes too many mistakes to last forever.
But I think his weakness is a lack of empathy. I want his replacement to have a *lot* of empathy.
Enough empathy to say "let's be nice to the old guard as they retire."
Someone who says "it's not about pushing him out," while still pushing him out, seems likely to develop more of the same problems.
We need people who care enough to care about the effects of their actions, regardless of their justification.
Last time I heard RMS talking he seemed to be kind of angry and tired and he explicitly asked others to carry this thing on instead of him.
I don't think he insists to be the only one, he just happens to be a prominent figure of the free software movement
@alcinnz @ehashman @ptvirgo @deejoe @gid I think the problem is something else: with all shortcomings RMS lives the way he preaches. I will be much less convinced by somebody giving their Free Software, Free Society presentation with slides coming out of their MacBook. I feel guilty typing this on an iPad myself.
@saper @alcinnz @ehashman @ptvirgo @deejoe @gid the thing RMS has done is to a) show us it can be done (and understand the trade-offs) and b) gives us an ideal of consistency to strive for. We all have different priorities. I still have a few minor niggling proprietary dependencies, but *very* few compared to anyone else I know... it's all relative.
It's too bad people have to continually conflate support for free software with support for him.
Some of us support his free software work while recognizing and acknowledging his weaknesses.
So, when you refer to his "detractors" do you mean anyone who might criticize him about anything? Do you mean for him to be accepted and rejected in all-or-nothing fashion?
The association fraud is here:
" because they are filled to the brim with so, so many shitty men.
Jeffrey Epstein. Marvin Minsky.
It's so easy to get added to that list.
Ah, I understand your confusion. You're behind on the story.
Understanding that minors cannot give consent is Consent 101 material, a sort of "Hello, world!" of consent. This is easy mode, something that if you get wrong, you are probably lost on more complex situations. Like, say, those that might occur managing a non-profit foundation.
Stallman spent more than a decade, as best we can tell, failing to grasp this "Hello, world!" level of consent.
He certainly got it wrong in those emails
He eventually came around, but it was far too little, far too late.
"I appreciate SDF but it's a general-purpose server and the name doesn't make it obvious that it's about art." - Eugen Rochko